Étiquette : Screenshot vs. Storyboard
Publié par 3 août 2026 par Xinwei
Un scénario explique l’idée en mots. Un storyboard teste si le public peut voir la relation, la séquence ou le contraste de ces mots dépendent. Les explicateurs forts utilisent les deux.
Give each planning artefact a different job
Write the script to define the viewer question, source-backed claim, sequence, and next action. Build the storyboard to decide what the viewer will actually see at each beat. Do not use a storyboard as a decorative slide list.
| Put this in the script | Put this in the storyboard |
|---|---|
| Viewer question and audience | What appears first and why |
| Source-supported wording and terms | Diagram, comparison, object, state, or transition that makes it visible |
| Narration order and decision boundary | What changes between beats |
| Next action and source reference | What the viewer should be able to recognise before moving on |
Copy this script-to-storyboard handoff
- Viewer question: ______________________________
- Source that supports the answer: ______________________________
- Narration beat: ______________________________
- Visual evidence: ______________________________
- What changes on screen: ______________________________
- Check or decision the viewer should recognise: ______________________________
- Next source or action: ______________________________
Use the deletion test
If a visual does not reveal a relationship, sequence, comparison, state, or relevant object, remove it. If a narration sentence has no visual evidence, decide whether it belongs in the source document instead. This keeps the finished explanation from becoming a narrated document.
Use the technical explainer script template for a source-led structure, or see the IT incident triage case for a visual decision path. Start from a script when the viewer question is settled.
Cas de source soutenu
Voir comment cette tâche devient une vidéo
FAQ